Sharon Cairns Mann:  award-winning author
  • Home
  • Fiction
  • Nonfiction
  • Awards
  • Blog: A Good Read
  • FOR SALE: Aflac Duck Collection
  • Contact & Sign Up
  • Product

Post #4:  More Bait!  Federal Bait!

7/7/2016

0 Comments

 
I previously discussed the tax treatment of a donation of a conservation easement to a land trust by the State of Colorado (a tax credit), but how does the IRS treat it?
 
IRS Treatment of a Conservation Easement Donation
 
In the simplest terms, the IRS treats a conservation easement donation like a charitable contribution:  a landowner gets a deduction (not a credit) on their federal income tax return for the donation. Additionally, you are not allowed to “sell” (transfer) your deduction to anyone else (unlike the tax credit).  So, the additional benefit to landowners doing conservation easements was a very large charitable deduction on their federal income tax return.
 
Additional Incentives
 
I’m going to jump ahead for a moment:  when we entered into the conservation easement program in 2005, our attorney explained that everyone loves it:  “the state loves it, the feds love it, the landowners love it. It’s win-win-win.” And, here’s support for that statement.
 
Not only did the State of Colorado find the conservation easement plan appealing (continually increasing the incentives), but so did the federal government.  In 2006, just when we were getting involved in the program, President Bush had signed a new bill putting exciting new incentives into the Conservation Easement Contribution provisions (HR4) by:

  • Raising the deduction a landowner can take for donating a conservation easement from 30% of their Adjusted Gross Income in any year to 50% (section 1206, page 792);
  • Extending the carryover period for the deduction from a total of six years to 16 years (section 1206, page 792);
  • Allowing qualifying farmers (people who derive more than 50% of their gross income from farming) to deduct up to 100% of their income; in this case, the land must be subject to a restriction in which the property remain agricultural or livestock production (section 1206, pages 793-794); and
  • Limiting these increased deductions to the taxable years between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 (after which the deductions revert to the previous 30% and 6 year carryover, unless Congress decides to extend the period again) – (section 1206, pages 793-794).
 
As you can see, there was plenty of bait.  
© Sharon Cairns Mann

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Hi! Welcome to this blog!   I'm a professional writer and award-winning author. I didn't really want to write this blog, but I also believe that the story of the huge conservation easement fiasco in Colorado has not yet been adequately told. So here it is!

    It's so long, I've had to serialize it, so please note that you have to START with Blog Post #1 (June 28, 2016) for the story to make sense!  So, if you're new to the blog, please go back to the beginning and start there.   

    New Post Notifications 
    ​The best way to hear about each my new blog posts on Swindled is to just go to my Public Facebook Page at
    Sharon Cairns Mann Writer
    and hit the "Like" button in the cover photo at the top. Every time I do a new blog post here, I'll announce it there, so it should keep you up-to-date. 

    But if you are interested in free writing tips and coaching, please subscribe to "Writerly News" by clicking the button below.

    Subscribe to "Writerly News"

    Archives

    April 2018
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.